Content disasters are bad. Organization disasters are badder. And believe it or not, but organization is perhaps one of the most overlooked and lacking aspects of any website published today. So, for the first half of today, we’re going to take a look at the one of the two most powerful features: organization schemes.
Exactly Subjective Scheming
There are exactly three kinds of schemes for us to choose from when designing a website so that its content may be better organized: exact organization schemes, subjective organization schemes, and hybrid organization schemes.
When we take a look at exact organization schemes, we are presented with a common array of kinds, ranging from alphabetical-ranking schemes to chronological-temporal schemes to geographical-placement schemes. These are especially useful when dealing with topical indexes set in place by a subjective scheme.
An external source referenced by our article indicates the applicability of an alphabetical organization scheme as shown by BBC.
If we wish to organize our very obscure materials, then we should probably consider a subjective organization scheme. This is precisely helpful when handling and assorting particular data with respective to its particular “organization or field.” Many of the suggestions offered by this article include topic schemes, task schemes, audience schemes, and metaphor schemes.
An external source referenced by our article indicates the applicability of an audience organization scheme as shown by Dell.
Notwithstanding the aforementioned notes, it is important to take into account the inexorable aspect of hybridization. No two things are specifically clean and cut, which is why exact and subjective schemes are combined to satiate a divided group of individuals.
Feeling a Tad Curious?
Duhhh. Well, check out the original usability.gov website for additional website content galore.
Go ahead and explore these useful links that were referenced throughout the post: